The International Equity Market
During the fourth quarter of 2009, international equity indices continued to experience strong gains as investors, who were concerned that foreign government agencies had not done enough to stave off continued declines in the credit markets, came back to the market. While currencies' gains and losses are usually seen more as a short term phenomena, the weakening US dollar over the past six years helped the international equity indices provide diversification against the US Markets and currency. The MSCI EAFE outgained the S&P 500 by 2.2% annualized for the past ten years.

Even though the United States continues to have the largest GDP as compared to other developed and rapidly developing countries, our GDP growth has remained relatively consistent as compared to the same countries. While international equity markets have traditionally been the tail that follows the trend of the domestic market, there are increased opportunities to diversify globally as the domestic market falls into a deeper recession.

Source: JPMorgan
The U.S. Dollar weakened against major foreign currencies in 2009 as investors came back to the market and domestic and foreign indices posted strong gains during the calendar year. During the global recession, investors sought the safety of the U.S. Dollar in order to protect assets as the U.S. Government took drastic steps to strengthen domestic financial markets. As market conditions have improved, the U.S. Dollar weakened as investors diversified their currency exposure to levels to close to, but still above pre-recession levels.

Source: JPMorgan
The Bond Market
During the fourth quarter of 2009, Treasuries and mortgages continued to underperform their credit related index counterparts as investors no longer sought the safety of government backed issues during the quarter and throughout 2009. High yield indices posted the largest gain in 2009 as option adjusted spreads on credits retracted from all time highs, but remain above historic averages. In addition to the gains posted by corporate securities, structured product returned well as the government released two programs aimed to secure banks' balance sheets against further losses.

The Federal Reserve kept the Fed Funds Rate at an all time low of a range between zero to twenty-five basis points since December 2008. Interest rates along the entire curve continued to remain low as investors attempted to unload riskier assets and buy Treasuries, but to a far lesser extent in 2009. The federal reserve has begun to address a growing concern regarding future monetary policy to fight possible inflation resulting from massive stimulus and bailout dollars being spent by an already deficit plagued federal system.

Credit spreads tightened from at all-time highs as investors sought the large yield currently existent in investment grade and below investment grade credits. Although high yield indices were aided by high coupon payments and asset flows into the asset class, credit fundamentals generally improved and market conditions appear to have eased worries from anxious investors. During 2009, investors were rewarded for owning lower rated credits and selling-off Treasuries and Agencies as spreads compressed.

Interest Rate Sensitivity
The table below shows the expected 12 month return of the listed indices at the interest rate level as of December 31, 2009. If interest rates were to increase or decrease uniformly across the curve that interest rate change would effect the indices expected 12 month return as outlined below. For example, as of December 31, 2009 the expected one year return of the Barclays Aggregate was 3.65%. If rates were to increase by 25 basis points the expected return of the index would decrease to 2.48%. Given the current interest rate environment it is likely that rates will rise and fixed income returns will decrease as a result.
12 Month Holding Period - Annualized Returns

Source: CMS BondEdge, Great Lakes Advisors
As of December 31, 2009 the expected three year annualized return of the Barclays Aggregate was 3.65%. If rates were to increase by 25 basis points the expected return of the index would decrease to 3.29%. Given the current interest rate environment it is likely that rates will rise and fixed income returns will decrease as a result. The interest rate sensitivity of fixed income indices should be considered for future planning assumptions.
36 Month Holding Period - Annualized Returns

Source: CMS BondEdge, Great Lakes Advisors
The Real Estate Market
The NCRIEF fourth quarter return was -3.5% and -29.8% for calendar year 2009. While real estate fundamentals are under pressure due to economic weakness and a rising unemployment rate, the most important factors affecting the real estate market has been rising cap rates and soft credit markets. Cap rates have risen sharply by 100-200 bps, which has lowered valuations. The lack of CMBS issuance and a restrictive lending environment significantly impacted transaction volume and appraisers have a very limited pool of comparable sales. The combination of these factors led to an unfriendly appraisal environment. However, the correction has likely occurred as managers revalue 100% of the portfolio on a quarterly basis. Furthermore, cap rates appear to have stabilized and may even be under slight upward pressure for quality properties. Most commingled real estate funds are experiencing redemption requests, and formed withdrawal queues, which for some managers is unprecedented. The key to the recovery are better employment conditions and improved credit markets. When these factors improve, cap rates will fall and transaction volume will rise, reversing some of the recent devaluation. New construction has been constrained. We are not entering this downturn with a significant over supply of new properties, so absorption rates could recover quickly.
UNLEVERAGED CAP RATE IMPACT

Given the superb historical risk adjusted returns for equity real estate, and the low correlation to other asset classes, IPS believes that allocations to this asset class are prudent. We also note that the long term return assumption of 7.5% is similar to the long term return goals of many pension plans.

The Hedge Fund of Funds Market
The quarter began with marked volatility for the equity markets. Long/short equity investments were hurt as equities sold off globally toward the end of October. Most gains from L/S strategies came from the short positions as both the US and international markets declined. Relative Value, Event Driven, and Tactical Trading, however, all had positive performance for the month and quarter. Corporate activity including M&A, corporate debt restructuring, and an increase in default rates provided ample opportunities for Event Driven strategies throughout the year. Credit driven strategies continued to generate positive returns via distressed debt positions, senior secured loans, and high yield bond exposure. Merger Arbitrage managers in the Event Driven space continue to find opportunity as the year ended with a number of significant corporate acquisitions announced. As equity markets broadened in the last months of the year, long equity exposure was a positive contributor for many funds. While managers believe the stock picking environment has improved, with correlations among securities decreased, short exposures are being maintained as a cautious hedge against a potential market correction.
Hedge Fund of Funds allocations were beneficial to investment portfolios in 2009 helping to contribute positive performance during periods of market declines, particularly in 1Q 2009 when both the equity and fixed income markets were negative. This downside protection helped position many funds for the subsequent market rally that followed. Multi-strategy FOF offered investors an opportunity for broad diversification in both the equity and fixed income space, particularly corporate credit strategies.
The HFRI FOF index finished the year up 11.5% compared with the S&P 500 returning 26.5% and the Barclays Aggregate at 5.9%. For the 10 years ended 12/31/09, the HFRI FOF index delivered a positive return of 4.0% versus the S&P 500 at -1.0%.
